1
Stage 1: Abstract Submission
Authors submit the title, category, abstract, keywords, and author information.
Understanding our review criteria, editorial timeline, and quality evaluations.
EIX uses a staged editorial process to assess scope, relevance, quality, originality, industry value, and publication readiness while keeping the author journey clear.
Editorial Methodology
All submissions are reviewed for relevance, originality, clarity, accuracy, and alignment with the objectives of the platform. The process focuses on practical value, quality, and industry relevance rather than academic peer review.
EIX is an editor-reviewed knowledge platform and not a peer-reviewed academic journal.
Initial screening for scope, quality, and originality.
Editorial review and assessment.
Subject matter review, where required.
Author revisions and clarifications.
Final approval and publication.
Editorial & Review Process
Each stage helps refine and evaluate the contribution, keeping communication simple and expectations transparent.
Authors submit the title, category, abstract, keywords, and author information.
The editorial team assesses relevance, scope, quality, and alignment with EIX objectives.
Authors upload the complete paper and supporting materials.
The editorial team evaluates quality, originality, factual accuracy, industry relevance, and presentation. Subject matter experts may be consulted where necessary.
Accepted papers are published and distributed through ENERGDIVE and ENERGClub channels.
Disclaimer
Content published through the ENERGDIVE Insights Exchange reflects the views, analysis, and conclusions of the respective authors. While submissions are reviewed by the ENERGDIVE editorial team for quality, relevance, and suitability, EIX is not a peer-reviewed academic journal, and publication should not be interpreted as an endorsement of the views expressed by contributors.